The California cult burger chain In-N-Out is banning its employees from wearing masks, according to an e-mail purportedly sent to the firm’s Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Nevada, and Utah associates.
“We are introducing new mask guidelines that emphasize the importance of customer service and the ability to show our Associates’ smiles and other facial features while considering the health and well-being of all individuals,” says the e-mail posted by left-wing “communicator” and Columbia University Irving Medical Center media officer Dr. Lucky Tran – who is demanding his 60,000 Twitter followers contact In-N-Out to express their disapproval for the policy.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
The e-mail continued: “No masks shall be worn in the Store or Support facility unless an Associate has a valid medical note exempting him or her from this requirement. Associates who wear masks for medical reasons must wear a company-provided N-95 mask. Note: A different type of mask may only be worn with a valid medical note exempting the Associate from the N-95 mask requirement.”
In-N-Out also fought back against California’s vaccine policing, insisting in 2021: “We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government. It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant associates to segregate customers into those who may be served and those who may not, whether based on the documentation they carry, or any other reason.”
This is absolutely batshit, just for the record, and I hope someone sues.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: CBS News is shutting down its radio service in May after nearly 100 years in operation, and laying off approximately six percent of its workforce.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: CBS News employees, including those affected by the layoffs, CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss, and CBS News President Tom Cibrowski.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The radio unit will officially go off air on May 22, 2026, with the announcement made on Friday in a memo to staff.
💬KEY QUOTE: “A shift in radio station programming strategies, coupled with challenging economic realities, has made it impossible to continue the service.” – CBS News executives
🎯IMPACT: The decision affects 60-70 employees and ends nearly a century of CBS News radio broadcasting, impacting 700 affiliated radio stations.
IN FULL
CBS News has announced the closure of its radio service after nearly 100 years in operation. In addition, approximately six percent of the network’s workforce will be laid off, affecting 60 to 70 employees. The announcement was made through a memo issued Friday from CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss and President Tom Cibrowski.
The memo acknowledged the challenges of the modern news business, stating, “It’s no secret that the news business is changing radically, and that we need to change along with it. New audiences are burgeoning in new places, and we are pressing forward with ambitious plans to grow and invest so that we can be there for them.”
Executives also addressed the closure of the radio service, citing shifts in radio programming strategies and economic realities as primary factors. “While this was a necessary decision, it was not an easy one,” the memo noted. The radio unit, which serves 700 affiliated stations, will officially go off air on May 22, 2026.
The closure comes as CBS’s parent company, Paramount, awaits regulatory approval for a merger with Warner Bros Discovery, the parent company of CNN. CBS sources have stated that this merger did not influence the decision to shut down the radio service. Regulatory approval for the deal is expected to take six months.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against Harvard University, alleging the institution failed to address anti-Semitism on campus.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The Trump administration, Harvard University, Jewish and Israeli students, and campus protesters.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed in a Massachusetts federal court on Friday, following incidents on Harvard’s campus from 2023 to 2025.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Jewish and Israeli students at Harvard University were harassed, physically assaulted, stalked, and spat upon… Harvard’s response to this: do nothing.” – Lawsuit filed by the Trump administration.
🎯IMPACT: The lawsuit seeks to revoke federal funding, appoint an external monitor, and require Harvard to collaborate with law enforcement on protest-related arrests.
IN FULL
The Trump administration on Friday filed a lawsuit against Harvard University, accusing the Ivy League institution of allowing anti-Semitism to persist on its campus. Filed in a Massachusetts federal court, the complaint alleges that Jewish and Israeli students have been harassed, physically assaulted, and subjected to a hostile environment with little to no intervention from the university.
According to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) filing, Harvard failed to address numerous anti-Semitic incidents, including students being blocked from entering buildings, being spat upon, and hearing chants such as “Heil Hitler” during protests. Notably, the legal action also seeks to classify certain pro-Hamas protest chants, such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” as calls for violence against Jewish people. The Trump administration claims that these actions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin at federally funded institutions.
Harvard has responded by defending its actions, stating that it has implemented measures to combat anti-Semitism, including enhanced training and education, as well as programs promoting civil dialogue. A university spokesman described the lawsuit as “yet another pretextual and retaliatory action by the administration for refusing to turn over control of Harvard to the federal government.”
This latest DOJ lawsuit is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to address alleged anti-Semitism at major universities. Unlike other institutions such as Columbia and Northwestern, Harvard has refused to reach a negotiated settlement with the administration. The university has also faced other legal challenges, including a recent lawsuit over its admissions records and accusations of failing to comply with the Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump announced he is considering “winding down” military operations against Iran.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald Trump and U.S.-Israeli forces.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The war is ongoing as of February 2026, across Iran and the wider Middle East.
💬KEY QUOTE: “We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East…” – President Trump
🎯IMPACT: Ending the war could stabilize the global economy, which is reeling from the impact of Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz and strikes on energy infrastructure.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump has indicated that the United States is nearing the completion of its military objectives in Iran and that operations may be gradually brought to an end. “We are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the Terrorist Regime of Iran,” he wrote in a Truth Social post on Friday.
Trump outlined his key goals as degrading Iran’s missile capabilities, destroying its defense industrial base, eliminating its navy and air force, and forcibly terminating its nuclear program. He also described “Protecting, at the highest level, our Middle Eastern Allies, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, and others”—which have been taking an increasing amount of damage as a result of Iranian retaliatory strikes, often targeting U.S. bases and energy infrastructure.
Additionally, Trump mentioned that the Strait of Hormuz, a major conduit for global energy and fertilizer supplies that has been closed by Iranian action, should be secured by others. “The Hormuz Strait will have to be guarded and policed, as necessary, by other Nations who use it — The United States does not! If asked, we will help these Countries in their Hormuz efforts, but it shouldn’t be necessary once Iran’s threat is eradicated,” he wrote, adding: “Importantly, it will be an easy Military Operation for them.”
The announcement comes as the unpopularity of the Iran war in the U.S. is increasing, and its negative economic impact is becoming more severe. Notably, and despite Trump’s Friday statement on the Iran war possibly winding down, the U.S. has in recent days begun to deploy an increasing number of ground troops to the region, signaling the potential for escalation, such as an amphibious assault on Iran’s Kharg Island oil hub.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: President Donald J. Trump’s approval rating has dropped to 42 percent, the lowest of his presidency, according to a new poll.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and 1,037 registered voters surveyed by JL Partners.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Poll conducted online from March 18 to March 20, 2026, amid the ongoing Iran war.
🎯IMPACT: Rising inflation, gas prices, and opposition to the Iran war are driving disapproval, with 54 percent of voters saying the economy is worsening.
IN FULL
President Donald J. Trump‘s approval rating has dropped to 42 percent, according to a new poll from Trump-friendly JL Partners. This marks the lowest approval rating of his presidency, down from 44 percent earlier this month and 48 percent in January. The poll surveyed 1,037 registered voters online from March 18 to March 20, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percent.
According to the survey, the Iran war and inflation fears are key reasons for the decline. Twenty-eight percent of respondents disapproved of Trump’s handling of the Middle East, up from 20 percent earlier this month. Meanwhile, 44 percent blamed him for rising inflation, an increase from 38 percent at the start of March. Gas prices have risen to $3.90 per gallon nationally, compared to $2.90 before U.S. strikes began on February 28.
Support for the Iran war has also waned. Initially, 40 percent of voters supported military action, but that figure has now dropped to 33 percent, with 49 percent opposing the conflict. Among Trump voters, support for the war has decreased from 75 percent to 61 percent, while opposition has risen to 22 percent. Thirteen U.S. troops have been killed and over 200 injured since the U.S.-Israeli operation against Iran started.
Economic sentiment has also worsened, with 54 percent of voters saying the economy is deteriorating, up from 44 percent last month. Only 16 percent believe the economy is improving, a significant drop from 30 percent in February. The poll also revealed that only 19 percent of voters would tolerate a $1 increase in gas prices to secure a military victory, while just seven percent would accept up to 10,000 American fatalities in the conflict.
Vice President J.D. Vance, however, has not seen his approval rating affected by the Iran war. His approval remains steady at 47 percent, five points higher than Trump’s. Notably, independents, who are crucial for Republican success in the 2026 midterm elections, oppose the war by a two-to-one margin, with 50 percent against and 24 percent in favor. Democrats are overwhelmingly opposed, with 76 percent disapproving of the decision to strike Iran.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge appointed by former President Joe Biden announced he will grant a motion by Democrat states to vacate a declaration by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. banning doctors from performing gender transition procedures such as breast amputations on minors.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. District Court Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), and officials from New York and 18 other states.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The announcement was made on Thursday in Oregon, with the judge’s formal written opinion expected soon.
💬KEY QUOTE: “No one should lose access to medically necessary health care because their federal government tried to interfere in decisions that belong in doctors’ offices.” – Letitia James
🎯IMPACT: The ruling challenges the HHS declaration, potentially allowing states to bypass restrictions on inflicting irreversible gender transition procedures on minors.
IN FULL
On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Mustafa Kasubhai, appointed by former President Joe Biden in late 2024, announced that he intends to grant a motion brought by a coalition of Democrat-led states to vacate a declaration issued by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. banning gender transition procedures such as breast amputations for minors.
The declaration, released in December 2025, stated that puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries are “neither safe nor effective” treatments for gender dysphoria, and do not meet professionally recognized standards of healthcare. It also warned that providers offering these services could face exclusion from federal programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
During a lengthy hearing, Judge Kasubhai indicated he would issue a formal written opinion soon and that he plans to deny the government’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit and grant the states’ request for summary judgment, effectively blocking the declaration’s enforcement.
The lawsuit, brought by Democrat-led states including New York and involving a total of 19 states plus Washington, D.C., argued that the declaration unlawfully overstepped HHS authority, interfered with state regulation of medicine, and violated federal rulemaking requirements.
New York Attorney General Letitia James stated, “No one should lose access to medically necessary health care because their federal government tried to interfere in decisions that belong in doctors’ offices.”
However, earlier this year in New York, a jury awarded a 22-year-old “detransitioner” $1.6 million for pain and suffering and $400,000 for future medical expenses after a psychologist and a surgeon performed transgender procedures on her, including a double mastectomy at age 16.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The British government has agreed to allow the United States to use British bases for defensive operations targeting Iranian missile sites attacking oil tankers and other vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Britain’s governing Labour Party, the U.S. military, and Iranian forces.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Announced on March 20, 2026, following a ministerial meeting in London, England.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Ministers condemned Iran’s expansion of its targets to include international shipping. They agreed that Iran’s reckless strikes… risked pushing the region further into crisis and worsening the economic impact being felt in the UK and around the world.” – Spokesman for Prime Minister Starmer
🎯IMPACT: The decision aims to safeguard international shipping and prevent further economic disruption caused by Iran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.
IN FULL
Britain’s Labour Party government has approved the use of British bases by the United States to conduct strikes targeting Iranian missile sites that have been used to attack ships in the Strait of Hormuz. The announcement followed a ministerial meeting to address escalating conflict in the Middle East.
A spokesman for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer stated that government ministers condemned Iran’s targeting of international shipping and civilian infrastructure, describing such actions as reckless and dangerous. The spokesman added, “They confirmed that the agreement for the U.S. to use UK bases in the collective self-defense of the region includes U.S. defensive operations to degrade the missile sites and capabilities being used to attack ships in the Strait of Hormuz.”
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi criticized the British decision, calling it “participation in aggression” and warning against targeting Iranian interests. Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper underscored that the decision was a response to Iran’s strikes on Gulf countries and its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical international shipping route for oil, gas, and fertilizer.
The economic ramifications of Iran’s actions have already been felt globally. The Bank of England warned that inflation could rise significantly due to higher wholesale energy costs. Oil and gas prices surged earlier in the week but retreated slightly on Friday, with Brent crude dropping to $108 per barrel.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Pentagon is deploying three additional warships and approximately 2,500 US Marines to the Middle East, marking the second deployment to the region this week.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), the USS Boxer amphibious ready group, the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, and President Donald J. Trump.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Deployment announced this week, with troops heading to CENTCOM’s area of operation in the Middle East.
💬KEY QUOTE: “No, I’m not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn’t tell you,” President Trump told the media when questioned on possible ground action in Iran.
🎯IMPACT: This deployment raises the possibility that Operation Epic Fury, the U.S.-Israeli operation against Iran, may escalate to involve a ground component, such as an amphibious assault on Kharg Island.
IN FULL
The U.S. Department of War is sending three additional warships and approximately 2,500 U.S. Marines to the Middle East, in the second troop deployment announced this week. This latest deployment includes the USS Boxer amphibious ready group and elements of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, likely intended to bolster ongoing U.S.-Israeli military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Earlier this week, the Pentagon ordered the deployment of 2,200 Marines and sailors aboard the USS Tripoli, based in Japan, to the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) area of operations in the Middle East, possibly to participate in the seizure of Iran’s Kharg Island. Notably, the island—located just off the coast of Iran in the northern Persian Gulf—serves as a critical hub for Iranian oil exports, hosting extensive petroleum storage and port facilities.
Despite the new Marine deployments and repositioning of warships, President Donald J. Trump insisted on Thursday that he does not currently intend to put “boots on the ground” in Iran. “No, I’m not putting troops anywhere. If I were, I certainly wouldn’t tell you,” Trump told the media, though he added that his administration will “do whatever’s necessary to keep the price” of oil down.
Notably, the latest Middle East deployments coincide with the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier leaving its position in the eastern Mediterranean off the coast of Israel for port in Greece to undergo minor repairs following a small kitchen fire. The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group remains positioned in the Arabian Sea in support of Operation Epic Fury.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: The Pentagon will maintain the National Guard presence in Washington, D.C., until 2029.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: President Donald J. Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, National Guard members, and local D.C. residents.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: Washington, D.C., through 2029 during Trump’s term.
🎯IMPACT: The National Guard presence has coincided with a sharp decline in crime, but sparked resistance from Democrat lawmakers and far-left political groups.
IN FULL
The Trump administration is expected to extend the deployment of National Guard members in Washington, D.C. until 2029. While the Pentagon has not formally announced the deployment extension, it is anticipated that the order will soon be approved by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, with the National Guard presence remaining in the nation’s capital until the end of President Donald J. Trump‘s second term in office.
The National Guard deployment across the capital has coincided with a notable reduction in violent crime, with the initial deployment last summer first extended until February 2026, and subsequently extended again in January until the end of the year. The National Pulse previously reported that data published by Washington, D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) shows that, year-to-date, homicides were down 80 percent, robberies down 58 percent, burglaries down 58 percent, car thefts down 57 percent, and crime across the board down 26 percent.
Additionally, the Washington, D.C., metro area’s public transit system announced this past January that 2025 saw the lowest crime rate on the subway and bus networks in decades. This precipitous drop in crime appears directly tied to the National Guard presence around the city.
The deployment has met with minor opposition, mainly from Democrat lawmakers on Capitol Hill and far-left activist groups that have organized small protests across the city. However, a survey of Washington, D.C. residents during the initial deployment last August shows that 54 percent of voters in the capital believe President Trump’s crackdown on violent crime and National Guard deployment is justified and necessary.
Still, attempts by the Trump administration to expand the successful crackdown on crime in Washington, D.C., to other major American cities have proven difficult. In mid-February, the Pentagon ended the federal deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland. This followed months of Democrat-led lawfare against the deployments.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: A Secret Service agent, Myosoty “Miyo” Perez, was suspended for failing to report her marriage to a foreign national and is under investigation. Notably, Perez was responsible for the security plan at the 2024 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where President Donald J. Trump was nearly assassinated
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: Myosoty “Miyo” Perez, the U.S. Secret Service, and her attorney Larry Berger.
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The suspension occurred following her marriage in April 2025, as reported in March 2026.
💬KEY QUOTE: “It speaks to the sad state of affairs of the Secret Service in recent years and who they’re hiring.” – Former Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official Rich Staropoli
🎯IMPACT: Ongoing investigations into Perez’s actions and broader scrutiny of Secret Service practices following multiple security failures.
IN FULL
The U.S. Secret Service has reportedly suspended agent Myosoty “Miyo” Perez, who served as the site agent responsible for the security arrangements at the July 2024 campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, where President Donald J. Trump was almost assassinated, for the third time in the past 18 months. The current suspension and ongoing internal investigation stem from her April 2025 marriage to a Brazilian national, which she did not report to the agency as required.
At Butler, Perez was involved in planning and implementing the security measures for the rally, which drew criticism for shortcomings such as the failure to place personnel on a critical rooftop that gunman Thomas Crooks used to shoot President Trump in the ear, kill Trump supporter Corey Comperatore, and wound two more rallygoers. She was among six agents involved in the Butler failures who were suspended without pay last year. However, by February, she was once again involved in high-level security for former President George W. Bush. She has also previously been suspended for speaking to the media about Butler without permission.
The latest probe centers not just on the fact that Perez failed to report her marriage, but on possible immigration-related concerns involving her spouse. “How does a Secret Service agent not properly report a relationship with a foreign national that could be an illegal alien, let alone marry her and then not report the marriage?” commented Rich Staropoli, a former Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official, adding that the situation “speaks to the sad state of affairs of the Secret Service in recent years and who they’re hiring.”
The DHS’s Office of Inspector General continues to work on final reports examining the Secret Service’s response to the 2024 assassination attempt. An earlier Secret Service report admitted to a catalogue of errors before and during the shooting.
Image by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
WE ARE 100% INDEPENDENT AND READER-FUNDED. FOR A GUARANTEED AD-FREE EXPERIENCE AND TO SUPPORT REAL NEWS, PLEASE SIGN UP HERE, TODAY.
❓WHAT HAPPENED: Two former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents have filed a lawsuit claiming they were wrongfully terminated after working on Biden-era investigations targeting President Donald J. Trump.
👤WHO WAS INVOLVED: The lawsuit involves two former FBI agents, FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Newsletter
Need to Know.
Your free, daily feed from The National Pulse.
Thank You!
You are now subscribed to our newsletter.
📍WHEN & WHERE: The lawsuit was filed on Thursday, March 19, 2026, in federal court in Washington, D.C.
💬KEY QUOTE: “Plaintiffs’ terminations were unlawful because they were based on a perception that Plaintiffs were not political supporters of President Trump,” the lawsuit filed by the former FBI agents claims.
🎯IMPACT: The case comes amid several federal and congressional investigations into the involvement of government officials in the 2016 election’s Russia collusion hoax and the post-2020 election’s Arctic Frost scandal.
IN FULL
Two former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents have filed a lawsuit claiming they were wrongfully terminated after working on Joe Biden-era investigations targeting President Donald J. Trump. The lawsuit, filed by two former Special Agents only identified as “John Doe 1” and “John Doe 2,” claims their dismissal by the Trump administration violated their constitutional rights under the First and Fifth Amendments.
“Plaintiffs request that this Court review their firings and grant relief on the grounds that Defendants’ actions violated Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights to free association and speech and their Fifth Amendment rights to due process. Plaintiffs seek equitable relief in vindication of their constitutional rights and declaratory relief under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202,” the lawsuit demands, while claiming, “Plaintiffs’ terminations were unlawful because they were based on a perception that Plaintiffs were not political supporters of President Trump.”
The lawsuit centers almost exclusively on the two former FBI agents’ involvement in the Arctic Frost scandal targeting Trump, Republican lawmakers, and GOP political groups, which was initiated by the FBI Washington Field Office’s former assistant special agent in charge, Timothy Thibault. After Thibault was forced to resign from the FBI in 2022 over his handling of a separate probe into Hunter Biden, the Arctic Frost investigation was handed over to Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith.
Notably, the former FBI agents claim that FBI Director Kash Patel dismissed them after congressional investigations into Arctic Frost, which led to one plaintiff being publicly named in documents and to the operation being labeled “partisan.” Both claim their firings are retaliation for perceived political affiliations. The lawsuit names Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and the DOJ as defendants.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
show more
By Popular Demand.
The National Pulse Now has an on-site comments section for members. Sign up today and be part of the conversation in our community of almost 15,000.
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.
